Why is Social Networking Use Relevant in Considering Electronic Discovery?
Data Growth and Enterprise Risk(1)
When you think of the drivers accelerating the amount of information being created and replicated in the Digital Universe, you may think of the financial databases of Wall Street, the acres of servers operating at giant Internet service providers, or the storage devices supporting 100 million enterprises in the world. However, more than 70% of the Digital Universe this year will be generated by end users – both in and out of the workplace.
Of this user-generated content – estimated to be approximately 880 billion gigabytes – about two-thirds of it is considered “enterprise touch”. This “enterprise touch” content is user generated content for which enterprises are responsible. Enterprises are responsible because this user-generated content passes through the servers, network, or routers of an enterprise at some point. When it does, the enterprise is responsible at that moment for managing that content, protecting user privacy, watching over account information, and protecting copyright.
The Growth of Social Networking (2)
In further looking at the growth of and responsibility for user generated content, it is important to note that while email appears to be the primary communications tool in most enterprise environments, when one considers the fact that the number of worldwide users of social networking surpassed users of email in July of 2009 (Figure 1), it seems to reason that legal professionals considering enterprise communications in their electronic discovery audits, investigations, and litigation should, if they have not already, begin to view social networking based communications in the same way they consider email communications.
Figure 1 – Communications: Social Networking and Email Usage
(1) IDC iView: The Digital Universe – Are Your Ready, dated May 2010.
(2) Morgan Stanley Presentation: Internet Trends, dated April, 2010.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 25th, 2010 at 2:16 pm. It is filed under chronology, original, uncategorized and tagged with electronic discovery, research, social media. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Providing timely articles, expert insight, and industry research, the Weekly eDiscovery News Update is the trusted source for relevant eDiscovery, corporate risk and vendor news and views for legal and technology professionals. Sign up today.
Taken from a combination of public market sizing estimations as shared in leading electronic discovery reports, publications and posts over time, the following eDiscovery Market Size Mashup shares general worldwide market sizing considerations for both the software and service areas of the electronic discovery market for the years between 2012 and 2017.
The gathering and use of information to help achieve personal and professional objectives has been a task executed by individuals and organizations from the beginning of time. However, with the advent of tools and technologies that can greatly accelerate this gathering and use of information, it is increasingly important that one considers not only the positive things that can be accomplished from the greater understanding derived from increased information access, but also considers the potential dark side usage of this increased information access.
Just as there are many tasks in electronic discovery, many times there are multiple technologies and platforms involved in the complete electronic discovery process. When there are multiple technologies and platforms involved, data must be transferred from disparate technologies and/or platforms to other disparate technologies and/or platforms. This data transfer can be considered a risk factor that affects the overall electronic discovery process.
In today’s “sound-bite” environment in which professional organizations compete for client attention through a variety of conduits and communications, it is increasingly important for marketing and sales leaders to consider and coordinate the use of all communications and communications tools in order to maximize impact and influence on potential clients.
Beginning in early 2012 the topic of Technology-Assisted Review moved from expert-led explanations to mainstream mentions in legal community articles, opinions, surveys and reports. Provided for your research, review and consideration are a compilation of key headlines and links from online sources on the topic of Technology-Assisted Review from February, 2012, until now.
Updated: 9/16/2013 – Provided for your consideration and use are the in-progress results of the One-Question Provider Implementation Survey launched by ComplexDiscovery on 3/3/13. The results consist of survey answers harvested directly from the online survey form as completed by provider representatives.
Updated 7/23/2013: Provided for your consideration and use are the in-progress results of the Predictive Coding and Provider Survey launched by ComplexDiscovery on 2/10/13. The in-progress results consist of survey answers harvested directly from the online survey form as completed by provider representatives.
Based on a website review of leading providers in the electronic discovery arena, the following list provides a quick, non-all inclusive reference of firms that appear to have developed “technology assisted review” technology (one form of this being “predictive coding”) for their own and/or partner offerings.