Presented during the 2012 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2012), the following original research on “the value of microblog content” is shared for your review and consideration.
Prepared by Paul Andre (Carnegie Mellon University), Michael Bernstein (MIT) and Kurt Luther (Georgia Institute of Technology), “Who Gives a Tweet: Evaluating Microblog Content Value” offers quantifiable insight into the perceived value of Twitter “tweets” through the lens of content, context and evolving social norms.
Primary questions considered as part of this milestone study of over 43,000 volunteer ratings on Twitter include:
“Conventional wisdom exists around these questions, but to our knowledge this is the first work to rigorously examine whether the commonly held truths are accurate. Further, by collecting many ratings, we are able to quantify effect sizes. A better understanding of content value will allow us to improve the overall experience of microblogging.” (Study Authors)
Predictors of “tweet” value in this study were based on “worth reading””neutral” or “not worth reading” ratings of individual tweets from eight specific categories that included.
Additionally, the reasons for determining whether a tweet was “liked” or “disliked” ranged from:
Reasons for Liking
Reasons for Disliking
PDF Version of Study: Click here.
Source: “Who Gives a Tweet: Evaluating Microblog Content Value” – Paul Andre (Carnegie Mellon University), Michael Bernstein (MIT) and Kurt Luther (Georgia Institute of Technology) – as prepared for CSCW’12, February 11–15, 2012, Seattle, Washington.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, February 21st, 2012 at 1:49 pm. It is filed under Blog Slider, chronology, discover, Insight and tagged with research, social media. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Comments are closed.
As part of the eDiscovery process, legal professionals typically use a combination of talent, technology, and techniques to do tasks ranging from preservation to production of electronically stored information. Many of the most often used technologies in this process come in the form of eDiscovery software.
Taken from a combination of public market sizing estimations as shared in leading electronic discovery reports, publications and posts over time, the following eDiscovery Market Size Mashup shares general worldwide market sizing considerations for software in the electronic discovery market for the years between 2014 and 2019.
Emerging technologies often represent new and innovative approaches to solving difficult problems. They also may have a significantly positive impact on the time, money, and resources required to complete previously daunting tasks. Yet until emerging technologies are effectively commercialized, they may offer users as much peril as promise.
Daily we read, see, and hear more and more about the tension corporate legal departments face as they decide how to source technology and talent for their eDiscovery efforts. Balancing cost, time, and complexity is a continual challenge and what is the right balance today may be out of balance tomorrow. This week our cartoon and clip provides one look at the impact of technology on outsourcing (cartoon), and shares considerations for right sourcing eDiscovery (clip).
ComplexDiscovery | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International