Tue. Mar 19th, 2024
ARCHIVED CONTENT
You are viewing ARCHIVED CONTENT released online between 1 April 2010 and 24 August 2018 or content that has been selectively archived and is no longer active. Content in this archive is NOT UPDATED, and links may not function.
 

Updated 04/11/2013

From descriptions to discussions to diatribes, many individuals and organizations have attempted to inform and influence opinion in regard to the recent predictive coding related transcripts, objections, declarations, opinions and orders in the matter of Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe & MSL Group, No. 11 Civ. 1279 (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y).

To help individuals form their own opinion in regard to predictive coding in relation to this matter from the original court documents, provided below is a single PDF document that consolidates key individual court documents into a single source for ease of study and consideration.

Documents Available

  • February 8, 2012:  Hearing Transcript – Parties Ordered To Submit Draft Protocol For Predictive Coding – Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe, No. 11 Civ. 1279 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 8, 2012)
  • February 22, 2012:  Parties’ Proposed Protocol Relating To The Production Of Electronically Stored Information (“ESI”) – Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe, No. 11 Civ. 1279 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 22, 2012)
  • February 22, 2012:  Plaintiff’s Rule 72(a) Objection to the Magistrate’s February 8, 2012 Discovery Rulings
  • February 22, 2012:  Declaration of Paul J. Neale in Support of Plaintiff’s Rule 72(a) Objections to Magistrate Judge Peck’s February 8, 2012 Discovery Rulings
  • February 24, 2012:  Opinion and Order – Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe & MSL Group, No. 11 Civ. 1279 (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2012)
  • March 7, 2012 – Defendant MSL Group’s Opposition To Plaintiffs’ Rule 72(A) Objection To Magistrate Judge Peck’s February 8, 2012 Rulings (S.D.N.Y. 3/7/2012)
  • March 9, 2012:  Plaintiff’s Request To File Further Objection Re: da Silva Moore, et al v. Publicis Groupe SA, et al. (11-cv-1279) (ALC) (AJP) (Approved For Filing By Judge Andrew Carter On March 13, 2012)
  • March 19, 2012: Plaintiff’s Reply In Support Of Rule 72(a) Objection To Magistrate Judge Peck’s February 8, 2012 Discovery Rulings (S.D.N.Y. 3/19/2012)
  • March 19, 2012: Declaration Of Paul J. Neale In Support Of Plaintiff’s Reply In Support Of Rule 72(a) Objections To Magistrate Judge Peck’s February 8, 2012 Discovery Rulings (S.D.N.Y. 3/19/2012)
  • April 2, 2012:  Judge Peck Order In Regard To Plaintiff’s Recusal Request Re: da Silva Moore, et al v. Publicis Groupe SA, et al. (11-cv-1279) (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. 4/2/12)
  • April 13, 2012:  Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Recusal or Disqualification (11-cv-1279) (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. 4/13/12)
  • April 13, 2012:  Declaration Of Steven L. Wittels In Support Of Plaintiff’s Motion For Recusal Or Disqualification (11-cv-1279) (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. 4/13/12) With Exhibits
  • April 16, 2012:  Proposed Schedule Re: da Silva Moore, et. al. v. Publicis Groupe SA, et.al. Case No. 11-CV-1279 (Memorandum) (Approved 4/16/2012)
  • April 26, 2012:  Opinion and Order (U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter) Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe & MSL Group, No. 11 Civ. 1279 (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. April 26, 2012)
  • April 30, 2012:  Memorandum Of Law In Opposition To Plaintiff’s Motion For Recusal Or Disqualification (S.D.N.Y. 4/30/12)
  • April 30, 2012:  Declaration Of Bret M. Anders In Support Of Defendant MSLGroup Americas, Inc’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion For Recusal Or Disqualification (11-cv-1279) (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. 4/30/12) With Exhibits
  • May 9, 2012:  Plaintiff’s Rule 72(a) Objection To The Magistrate’s April 25, 2012 Discovery Rulings (11-cv-1279) (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. 5/9/12)
  • May 10, 2012:  Reply Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Plaintiff’s Motion For Recusal Or Disqualification (11-cv-1279) (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. 5/10/12) With Exhibits
  • May 14, 2012:  Judge Peck Order Stopping Defendant MSL Groups Production Of ESI (11-cv-1279) (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. 5/14/12)
  • May 14, 2012:  Memorandum In Support Of Notice Of Motion For Leave To File A Brief Amicus Curiae In Support Of Plaintiff’s Motion For Recusal OR Disqualification (11-cv-1279) (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. 5/14/12)
  • May 15, 2012:  Brief Amicus Curiae In Support Of Plaintiff’s Motion For Recusal Or Disqualification (11-cv-1279) (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. 5/14/12)
  • May 15, 2012:  Notice Of Motion For Leave To File A Brief Amicus Curiae In Support Of Plaintiff’s Motion For Recusal OR Disqualification (11-cv-1279) (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. 5/15/12)
  • May 21, 2012:  Plaintiffs’ Rule 72(a) Objection to the Magistrate’s May 7, 2012 Discovery Ruling (11-cv-1279) (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. 5/21/12)
  • May 21, 2012:  Declaration of Siham Nurhussein in Support of Plaintiffs’ Rule 72(a) Objection to the Magistrate’s May 7, 2012 Discovery Rulings (11-cv-1279) (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. 5/21/12) With Exhibits
  • June 4, 2012:  Defendant MSLGroup’s Opposition To Plaintiff’s Rule 72(A) Objection To Magistrate Judge Peck’s May 7, 2012 Rulings (11-cv-1279) (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. 6/4/12)
  • June 15, 2012: Opinion and Order of Magistrate Judge Peck –  Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe & MSL Group, No. 11 Civ. 1279 (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. June 15, 2012)
  • June 29, 2012: Plaintiff’s Rule 72(A) Objection To The Magistrate’s June 15, 2012 Opinion And Order (11-cv-1279) (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2012)
  • July 16, 2012:  Memorandum Of Law To Plaintiffs’s Rule 72(A) Objection To Magistrate Judge Peck’s June 15, 2012 Opinion and Order (11-cv-1279) (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. July 16, 2012)
  • November 8, 2012: Order From Andrew L. Carter, U.S. District Judge (11-cv-1279) (ALC) (AJP)  (S.D.N.Y. November 8, 2012)
  • April 10, 2013:  Denial of Writ of Mandamus Petition (11-cv-1279, Carter, J., Peck, M.J.) Case:12-5020 (United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, April 10, 2013)

Document Index:  Combined PDF of  Key Documents Highlighting Judicial Consideration of Predictive Coding through the Lens of Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe & MSL Group, No. 11 Civ. 1279 (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y).

  • PDF Page 1:  Hearing Transcript
  • PDF Page 100: Parties’ Proposed Protocol
  • PDF Page 161:  Plaintiff’s Objection
  • PDF Page 185:  Declaration of Paul J. Neale
  • PDF Page 198:  Opinion and Order (Judge Andrew Peck)
  • PDF Page 247: Defendant MSL Group’s Opposition To Plaintiffs’ Rule 72(A) Objection To Magistrate Judge Peck’s February 8, 2012 Rulings
  • PDF Page 279: Plaintiff’s Request To File Further Objection (Approval For Filing By Judge Andrew Carter)
  • PDF Page 281: Plaintiff’s Reply In Support Of Rule 72(a) Objection To Magistrate Judge Peck’s February 8, 2012 Discovery Rulings
  • PDF Page 295:  Declaration Of Paul J. Neale In Support Of Plaintiff’s Reply In Support Of Rule 72(a) Objections To Magistrate Judge Peck’s February 8, 2012 Discovery Rulings
  • PDF Page 301:  Judge Peck Order In Regard To Plaintiff’s Recusal Request Of March 28, 2012.
  • PDF Page: 303: Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Recusal or Disqualification (4/13/2012)
  • PDF Page 319:  Declaration Of Steven L. Wittels In Support Of Plaintiff’s Motion For Recusal Or Disqualification (4/13/2012)
  • PDF Page 538:  Proposed Schedule Re: da Silva Moore, et. al. v. Publicis Groupe SA, et.al. Case No. 11-CV-1279 (Memorandum) (Approved 4/16/2012)
  • PDF Page 542:  Judge Carter Order In Regard To Plaintiff’s Recusal Request (4/26/2012)
  • PDF Page 547:  Memorandum Of Law In Opposition To Plaintiff’s Motion For Recusal Or Disqualification (4/30/12)
  • PDF Page 571:  Declaration Of Bret M. Anders In Support Of Defendant MSLGroup Americas, Inc’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion For Recusal Or Disqualification (4/30/12)
  • PDF Page 829: Plaintiff’s Rule 72(a) Objection To The Magistrate’s April 25, 2012 Discovery Rulings (5/9/12)
  • PDF Page 1275: Judge Peck Order Stopping Defendant MSL Groups Production Of ESI (5/14/12)
  • PDF Page 1276:  Memorandum In Support Of Notice Of Motion For Leave To File A Brief Amicus Curiae In Support Of Plaintiff’s Motion For Recusal OR Disqualification) (5/14/12)
  • PDF Page 1283: Brief Amicus Curiae In Support Of Plaintiff’s Motion For Recusal Or Disqualification (5/14/12)
  • PDF Page  1319: Order Denying Motion (Notice Of Motion For Leave To File A Brief Amicus Curiae In Support Of Plaintiff’s Motion For Recusal OR Disqualification) (5/15/12)
  • PDF Page 1321: Plaintiffs’ Rule 72(a) Objection to the Magistrate’s May 7, 2012 Discovery Ruling (5/21/12)
  • PDF Page 1336:  Declaration of Siham Nurhussein in Support of Plaintiffs’ Rule 72(a) Objection to the Magistrate’s May 7, 2012 Discovery Rulings (5/21/12)
  • PDF Page 1415:  Defendant MSLGroup’s Opposition To Plaintiff’s Rule 72(A) Objection To Magistrate Judge Peck’s May 7, 2012 Rulings  (6/4/12)
  • PDF Page 1433:  Opinion and Order (Judge Andrew Peck) (6/15/12)
  • PDF Page 1489:  Plaintiff’s Rule 72(a) Objection To The Magistrate’s June 15, 2012 Opinion And Order (6/29/12)
  • PDF Page 1527:  Memorandum Of Law To Plaintiffs’s Rule 72(A) Objection To Magistrate Judge Peck’s June 15, 2012 Opinion and Order (7/16/12)
  • PDF Page 1554:  Order From Andrew L. Carter, U.S. District Judge (ALC) (AJP)  (11/8/12)
  • PDF Page 1559:  Denial of Writ of Mandamus Petition (11-cv-1279, Carter, J., Peck, M.J.) Case:12-5020 (United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 4/10/13)

PDF Download (Updated 04/11/2012)

Source:  Public Domain

 

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Model Use

ComplexDiscovery OÜ recognizes the value of GAI and LLM tools in streamlining content creation processes and enhancing the overall quality of its research, writing, and editing efforts. To this end, ComplexDiscovery OÜ regularly employs GAI tools, including ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, and DALL-E, to assist, augment, and accelerate the development and publication of both new and revised content in posts and pages published (initiated in late 2022).

ComplexDiscovery also provides a ChatGPT-powered AI article assistant for its users. This feature leverages LLM capabilities to generate relevant and valuable insights related to specific page and post content published on ComplexDiscovery.com. By offering this AI-driven service, ComplexDiscovery OÜ aims to create a more interactive and engaging experience for its users, while highlighting the importance of responsible and ethical use of GAI and LLM technologies.

 

Have a Request?

If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know, and we will make our response to you a priority.

ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a highly recognized digital publication focused on providing detailed insights into the fields of cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery. Based in Estonia, a hub for digital innovation, ComplexDiscovery OÜ upholds rigorous standards in journalistic integrity, delivering nuanced analyses of global trends, technology advancements, and the eDiscovery sector. The publication expertly connects intricate legal technology issues with the broader narrative of international business and current events, offering its readership invaluable insights for informed decision-making.

For the latest in law, technology, and business, visit ComplexDiscovery.com.