From descriptions to discussions to diatribes, many individuals and organizations have attempted to inform and influence opinion in regard to the recent predictive coding related transcripts, objections, declarations, opinions and orders in the matter of Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe & MSL Group, No. 11 Civ. 1279 (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y).
To help individuals form their own opinion in regard to predictive coding in relation to this matter from the original court documents, provided below is a single PDF document that consolidates key individual court documents into a single source for ease of study and consideration.
Document Index: Combined PDF of Key Documents Highlighting Judicial Consideration of Predictive Coding through the Lens of Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe & MSL Group, No. 11 Civ. 1279 (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y).
PDF Download (Updated 04/11/2012)
Source: Public Domain
This entry was posted on Friday, March 2nd, 2012 at 2:39 pm. It is filed under views and tagged with electronic discovery, research, social media, vendors. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Comments are closed.
Based on an informal review of research from technology providers, industry analyst firms, and industry expert reports in the data discovery arena, the following short list of enablers highlights companies and technologies that may be useful to technology providers as legal discovery professionals seek to move “to the left of the EDRM” and closer to the point of data creation in their data discovery efforts.
The Victorian Supreme Court will issue a practice note about the use of TAR on 1 January 2017. We understand it will be the first court in Australia to do so. We expect that other Australian courts will follow suit in issuing a practice note, and it will be interesting to follow the approaches taken by other Australian courts.
The biggest takeaway of the joint research project by nonprofit Electronic Discovery Institute and tech giant Oracle Corp. is that TAR is often faster and cheaper when identifying relevant documents. But when it comes to isolating privileged or sensitive information, human reviewers outperformed machines.
ComplexDiscovery | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International