From descriptions to discussions to diatribes, many individuals and organizations have attempted to inform and influence opinion in regard to the recent predictive coding related transcripts, objections, declarations, opinions and orders in the matter of Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe & MSL Group, No. 11 Civ. 1279 (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y).
To help individuals form their own opinion in regard to predictive coding in relation to this matter from the original court documents, provided below is a single PDF document that consolidates key individual court documents into a single source for ease of study and consideration.
Document Index: Combined PDF of Key Documents Highlighting Judicial Consideration of Predictive Coding through the Lens of Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe & MSL Group, No. 11 Civ. 1279 (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y).
PDF Download (Updated 04/11/2012)
Source: Public Domain
This entry was posted on Friday, March 2nd, 2012 at 2:39 pm. It is filed under views and tagged with electronic discovery, research, social media, vendors. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Comments are closed.
Before organizational leaders begin to apply valuable resources to evaluating the impact of new technology or the value of a new service, it is important they have a feel for the ability of the technology or service to be delivered, managed, and supported over time. Many vendors and integrators champion their ability to solve a problem with a new technology or service but fall short of providing convincing evidence that they can support that problem solving over time and at volume.
Our quest for quality legal search requires that we keep the natural human weakness of inconsistency front and center. Only computers are perfectly consistent. To help keep the human reviewers as consistent as possible, and so mitigate any damages that inconsistent coding may cause, a whole panoply of quality control and quality assurance methods should be used, not just improved search methods.
What Special Master Grossman ordered was a controlled fishing expedition. To the extent either party had questions about the processes, procedures or even the bona fides of the other side, Grossman gave them a chance to do a little fishing. What was really novel about the idea is that she didn’t open the waters to a full-scale fishing expedition. Rather, she gave each party a limited chance to challenge one or more parts of the process to the extent they thought something smelled (well, how could I resist?) fishy.
ComplexDiscovery | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International