Based on a website review of leading providers in the electronic discovery arena, the following list provides a quick, non-all inclusive reference of firms that appear to have developed “technology-assisted review” technology (one form of this being “predictive coding”) for their own and/or partner offerings.
“Technology-Assisted Review” Providers
Forms/Terms for “Technology Assisted Review” include:
Click here to provide additions, corrections and/or updates.
This entry was posted on Saturday, January 26th, 2013 at 12:54 pm. It is filed under original, Technology-Assisted Review and tagged with archiving, electronic discovery, information governance, research, risk, security, social media, storage, vendors. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Taken from a combination of public market sizing estimations as shared in leading electronic discovery reports, publications and posts over time, the following eDiscovery Market Size Mashup shares general worldwide market sizing considerations for software and services in the electronic discovery market for the years between 2015 and 2020.
The following letter is from Gordon Cormack, Professor with the School of Computer Science at the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada. Gordon is an information retrieval expert in the area of technology-assisted review in litigation, including influential works co-authored by Maura Grossman, a fellow researcher at the University of Waterloo.
ComplexDiscovery | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International