Based on a website review of leading providers in the electronic discovery arena, the following list provides a quick, non-all inclusive reference of firms that appear to have developed “technology-assisted review” technology (one form of this being “predictive coding”) for their own and/or partner offerings.
“Technology-Assisted Review” Providers
Forms/Terms for “Technology Assisted Review” include:
Click here to provide additions, corrections and/or updates.
This entry was posted on Saturday, January 26th, 2013 at 12:54 pm. It is filed under original, Technology-Assisted Review and tagged with archiving, electronic discovery, information governance, research, risk, security, social media, storage, vendors. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Taken from a combination of public market sizing estimations as shared in leading electronic discovery reports, publications and posts over time, the following eDiscovery Market Size Mashup shares general worldwide market sizing considerations for software and services in the electronic discovery market for the years between 2015 and 2020.
When Maura Grossman speaks, people listen. In 2011, she was already known as a leading e-discovery attorney and litigator. But her influence exploded when she released research with co-author Gordon Cormack, a computer science professor at the University of Waterloo in Ontario, that concluded software using predictive-coding technology can do as good a job of sifting through documents as human reviewers.
ComplexDiscovery | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International