Based on a website review of leading providers in the electronic discovery arena, the following list provides a quick, non-all inclusive reference of firms that appear to have developed “technology-assisted review” technology (one form of this being “predictive coding”) for their own and/or partner offerings.
“Technology-Assisted Review” Providers
Forms/Terms for “Technology Assisted Review” include:
Click here to provide additions, corrections and/or updates.
This entry was posted on Saturday, January 26th, 2013 at 12:54 pm. It is filed under original, Technology-Assisted Review and tagged with archiving, electronic discovery, information governance, research, risk, security, social media, storage, vendors. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Based on an informal review of research from technology providers, industry analyst firms, and industry expert reports in the data discovery arena, the following short list of enablers highlights companies and technologies that may be useful to technology providers as legal discovery professionals seek to move “to the left of the EDRM” and closer to the point of data creation in their data discovery efforts.
The Victorian Supreme Court will issue a practice note about the use of TAR on 1 January 2017. We understand it will be the first court in Australia to do so. We expect that other Australian courts will follow suit in issuing a practice note, and it will be interesting to follow the approaches taken by other Australian courts.
The biggest takeaway of the joint research project by nonprofit Electronic Discovery Institute and tech giant Oracle Corp. is that TAR is often faster and cheaper when identifying relevant documents. But when it comes to isolating privileged or sensitive information, human reviewers outperformed machines.
ComplexDiscovery | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International