Providing new impetus for ongoing discussions regarding technology-assisted review, recent court documents from the matter of In Re: Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation are spawning new eDiscovery conversations and critiques ranging from multimodal assisted review approaches to mathematical analysis of expert briefs.
While much will likely be written about the process of technology-assisted review in this matter, provided below for your review and research are actual court documents (consolidated PDF) and industry commentaries (limited listing of articles/resources) that may be beneficial as you study and draw your own conclusions on the eDiscovery approaches and math in this matter.
Key Documents In Re: Biomet M2A Magnum Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation
Consolidated Document Index (PDF Page, Chronology and Subject)
Limited Listing of Related Articles/Resources
Source: Public Domain
This entry was posted on Thursday, April 25th, 2013 at 10:49 am. It is filed under chronology, views and tagged with electronic discovery, research, social media, vendors. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Comments are closed.
Taken from a combination of public market sizing estimations as shared in leading electronic discovery reports, publications and posts over time, the following eDiscovery Market Size Mashup shares general worldwide market sizing considerations for software and services in the electronic discovery market for the years between 2015 and 2020.
The following letter is from Gordon Cormack, Professor with the School of Computer Science at the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada. Gordon is an information retrieval expert in the area of technology-assisted review in litigation, including influential works co-authored by Maura Grossman, a fellow researcher at the University of Waterloo.
ComplexDiscovery | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International