ARCHIVED CONTENT
You are viewing ARCHIVED CONTENT released online between 1 April 2010 and 24 August 2018 or content that has been selectively archived and is no longer active. Content in this archive is NOT UPDATED, and links may not function.By Herbert L. Roitblat, Ph.D.
This is my second blog post about Cormack and Grossman’s latest article, “ Evaluation of Machine-Learning Protocols for Technology-Assisted Review in Electronic Discovery .” In their article they compared several versions of TAR (or, as I prefer, CAR — Computer Assisted Review), one of which was based on using simple random sampling as the training set. In my previous blog , I argued that they are CAR vendors, they have a vested interest in making their algorithm appear better than others, and that the system that they tested using random sampling bears almost no […]