This week’s newsletter highlights five key posts on information governance and electronic discovery that are presented to inform and update legal and information technology professionals.
The newsletter also contains an informative weekly cartoon that may be of interest to individuals seeking to extend their capability to discover and govern data.
This entry was posted on Wednesday, February 10th, 2016 at 11:31 am. It is filed under chronology, news, Newsletters and tagged with analytics, ediscovery, electronic discovery, predictive coding. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Based on an informal review of research from technology providers, industry analyst firms, and industry expert reports in the data discovery arena, the following short list of enablers highlights companies and technologies that may be useful to technology providers as legal discovery professionals seek to move “to the left of the EDRM” and closer to the point of data creation in their data discovery efforts.
The Victorian Supreme Court will issue a practice note about the use of TAR on 1 January 2017. We understand it will be the first court in Australia to do so. We expect that other Australian courts will follow suit in issuing a practice note, and it will be interesting to follow the approaches taken by other Australian courts.
The biggest takeaway of the joint research project by nonprofit Electronic Discovery Institute and tech giant Oracle Corp. is that TAR is often faster and cheaper when identifying relevant documents. But when it comes to isolating privileged or sensitive information, human reviewers outperformed machines.
ComplexDiscovery | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
The annual LegalTech® gathering in New York continues to be an important 'validation' opportunity for participants to both hear and...