Extract from article by Lisa Hoover McGreevy
Emojis [ ] and emoticons 🙂 used to be exclusive BFFs with teens. Now adults are peppering texts and tweets with the expressive little images and it’s having a surprising effect on e-discovery.
There’s no official manual governing the use of emojis and emoticons, so their meaning is subject to the interpretation of the sender and the receiver. That’s no problem when you’re having a casual chat, but who decides their intent and meaning if those electronic messages become evidence in a court case?
This entry was posted on Thursday, February 25th, 2016 at 4:19 pm. It is filed under industry and tagged with ediscovery, electronic discovery. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Taken from a combination of public market sizing estimations as shared in leading electronic discovery reports, publications and posts over time, the following eDiscovery Market Size Mashup shares general worldwide market sizing considerations for software and services in the electronic discovery market for the years between 2015 and 2020.
When Maura Grossman speaks, people listen. In 2011, she was already known as a leading e-discovery attorney and litigator. But her influence exploded when she released research with co-author Gordon Cormack, a computer science professor at the University of Waterloo in Ontario, that concluded software using predictive-coding technology can do as good a job of sifting through documents as human reviewers.
ComplexDiscovery | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International