Extract from article by Jeff Bennion published by Above The Law
Technological advances have brought some unique challenges to the discovery process, but they have also brought solutions. I imagine that as technology continues to evolve, more unique issues will arise but also be accompanied by more advanced solutions. We may or may not see TAR become the standard. Even if we do, we might see it disrupted by some new technology that has even greater promise but brings with it all the unanticipated issues associated with new ideas. All the new forms of communications will create more and more potential avenues for discovery. We are seeing all of these issues now, but we will see them develop further over the next five years.
This entry was posted on Wednesday, March 2nd, 2016 at 3:46 pm. It is filed under chronology, industry and tagged with ediscovery, electronic discovery. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Taken from a combination of public market sizing estimations as shared in leading electronic discovery reports, publications and posts over time, the following eDiscovery Market Size Mashup shares general worldwide market sizing considerations for software and services in the electronic discovery market for the years between 2015 and 2020.
Today, there are still a lot of lawyers that don’t know a lot about “computer stuff,” but at least they’re smart enough not to admit it in court. In the nine years since the 2006 FRCP amendment on e-discovery, there has been great improvement in the bar’s knowledge and sophistication with e-discovery. But there’s still a long way to go with many lawyers.
ComplexDiscovery | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
An automated SaaS offering should be sufficiently autonomous to facilitate workflow across multiple stages of the EDRM with little manual...