ARCHIVED CONTENT
You are viewing ARCHIVED CONTENT released online between 1 April 2010 and 24 August 2018 or content that has been selectively archived and is no longer active. Content in this archive is NOT UPDATED, and links may not function.By Richard Raysman and Peter Brown
Technology-Assisted Review (hereinafter TAR) is broadly defined as the use of computer tools to determine the relevance of selected documents to any issues in a given controversy. The most utilized form of TAR, known as predictive coding, allows a human reviewer to utilize a select sample of documents to “train” a computer to recognize patterns of relevance in the universe of documents under review.
To be more precise, the parties input foreseeably relevant criteria into the coding software, such as keywords, dates, names of individuals, and document types. As the coding software applies this human “training” in an iterative fashion, a smaller relevant subset and a larger set of irrelevant documents is produced. Because predictive coding produces a smaller, more accurate set of relevant documents, the producing party spends less time and cost on reviewing for privilege, and the requesting party similarly expends fewer resources on determining the accuracy of the information than had it applied manual document review and keyword searches.
Read the complete article at: Courts Continue to Acknowledge Increasing Prominence of TAR