A weekly subscription newsletter highlighting of five key posts on information governance and electronic discovery to inform and update legal and information technology professionals.
This entry was posted on Thursday, January 12th, 2017 at 2:30 am. It is filed under chronology, news, Newsletters and tagged with analytics, automation, ediscovery, electronic discovery, predictive coding, technology-assisted review. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Based on an informal review of research from technology providers, industry analyst firms, and industry expert reports in the data discovery arena, the following short list of enablers highlights companies and technologies that may be useful to technology providers as legal discovery professionals seek to move “to the left of the EDRM” and closer to the point of data creation in their data discovery efforts.
The Victorian Supreme Court will issue a practice note about the use of TAR on 1 January 2017. We understand it will be the first court in Australia to do so. We expect that other Australian courts will follow suit in issuing a practice note, and it will be interesting to follow the approaches taken by other Australian courts.
The biggest takeaway of the joint research project by nonprofit Electronic Discovery Institute and tech giant Oracle Corp. is that TAR is often faster and cheaper when identifying relevant documents. But when it comes to isolating privileged or sensitive information, human reviewers outperformed machines.
ComplexDiscovery | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
In early January, the LTPI unveiled two resources for the legal technology community on information governance (IG) and meet-and-confer meetings...